 |
ADMINISTRATIVE PATENT JUDGE PROPERLY RECUSED THEMSELVES AFTER INSTITUTION OF IPR*
Centripetal Networks, LLC v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc., 23-2027
|
October 22, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
![]() |
IPOwners Quarterly™ 10/22/2025
|
October 21, 2025 |
IPOwners Quarterly |
 |
Chief IP Counsel In a Box 2025 Update
|
October 20, 2025 |
IPO Law Journal |
|
AI Patenting Handbook Version 3.0
|
October 20, 2025 |
IPO Law Journal |
 |
IPO Comments to INPI Regarding Draft Guidelines for Patent Examination of AI-Related Inventions
|
October 17, 2025 |
Testimony and Comments |
|
PROCEDURAL DISCLAIMER APPLIES TO PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED PATENTS IN THE SAME FAMILY* *
Barrette Outdoor Living, Inc. v. Fortress Iron, LP, 24-1231, 24-1359
|
October 17, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
|
FEDERAL CIRCUIT HAS JURISDICTION OVER ANTI-SLAPP MOTION* *
IQE PLC v. Newport Fab, LLC, 24-1124
|
October 15, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
|
WATER FILTER SPECIFICATION LACKED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF NON-CARBON BLOCK FILTER MEDIA* *
Brita LP v. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 24-1098
|
October 15, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
|
ISSUE PRECLUSION DOES NOT APPLY TO VALIDITY OF CLAIMS THAT DEPEND EXCLUSIVELY FROM CLAIMS FOUND UNPATENTABLE IN IPR PROCEEDINGS*
Inland Diamond Prods. Co. v. Cherry Optical Inc., 24-1106
|
October 15, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
|
ISSUE OF PATENT OWNERSHIP BEFORE THE ITC HAD NO BEARING ON IPR DETERMINATION*
Causam Ents., Inc. v. ecobee Techs. ULC, 24-1958
|
October 15, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
|
CONTINUATION-IN-PART WAS NOT COVERED BY ASSIGNMENT OF CONTINUATIONS*
Causam Ents., Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm., 23-1769
|
October 15, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
|
101 Eligibility Rejection Response Strategies
|
October 09, 2025 |
IPO Law Journal |
|
ORGANIZATION LACKS ASSOCIATIONAL STANDING TO CHALLENGE USPTO DENIAL OF RULEMAKING PETITION* *
US Inventor Inc. v. U.S. Pat. & Trademark Off., 24-1396
|
October 03, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
|
DISTRICT COURT DID NOT ERR IN REDUCING $10 MILLION DAMAGE AWARD TO NOMINAL DAMAGES*
Rex Med., L.P. v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc., 24-1072, 24-1125
|
October 02, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
|
IPO Comments to USTR Regarding 2025 Notorious Markets
|
October 01, 2025 |
Testimony and Comments |
|
DEFENDANT WAIVED PATENT INFRINGEMENT ARGUMENTS IN CROSS-REFERENCING BRIEFS*
Focus Prods. Grp. Int’l LLC v. Kartri Sales Co. Inc., 23-1446, 23-1450, 23-2148, 23-2149
|
September 30, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
|
FEDERAL CIRCUIT VACATES TTAB RULING IN ASPIRE BANK TRADEMARK OPPOSITION*
Apex Bank v. CC Serve Corp., 2023-2143
|
September 25, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
![]() |
CONFUSING EXPERT TESTIMONY WAS INSUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT INFRINGEMENT VERDICT* *
Finesse Wireless LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC, Nokia of America Corp., 2024-1039
|
September 25, 2025 |
|
|
REQUIRING CLINICALLY PROVEN EFFECTIVENESS FAILED TO MAKE ANTICIPATED CLAIMS PATENTABLE* *
Bayer Pharma Aktiengesellschaft v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Invagen Pharmaceuticals, 2023-2434
|
September 23, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
|
PREVAILING PARTY ON DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE IS ENTITLED TO COSTS* *
Future Link Sys., LLC v. Realtek Semiconductor Corp., 23-1056, 23-1057
|
September 09, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
|
DISTRICT COURT ABUSED DISCRETION BY ALLOWING IMPROPER AND PREJUDICIAL INFRINGEMENT ARGUMENT* *
Magēmā Tech. LLC v. Phillips 66, 24-1342
|
September 08, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
![]() |
Preliminary Injunctions in Brazilian SEP Litigation: Strategic Tools and Legal Safeguards
|
August 29, 2025 |
Business and Litigation |
|
DISTRICT COURT LACKED JURISDICTION OVER SECTION 145 CLAIM* *
Hyatt v. Stewart, 18-2390, 18-2391, 28-2392, 19-1049, 24-1992, 24-1993, 24-1994, 24-1995, 19-1038, 19-1039, 19-1070
|
August 29, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
|
IPO Comments to USPTO Regarding OECD Draft Voluntary Guidelines for Countering Illicit Trade in Counterfeit Goods on Online Marketplaces
|
August 26, 2025 |
Testimony and Comments |
|
USPTO FAILED TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT EXPLANATION FOR DENIAL OF TRADEMARK REGISTRATION* *
In re Brunetti, 23-1539
|
August 26, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
|
USPTO PROPERLY DETERMINED AIA DERIVATION PROCEEDING THROUGH HARMLESS ERROR GLOBAL* *
Health Solutions LLC v. Selner, 23-2009
|
August 26, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
|
2025 Impact Report
|
August 24, 2025 |
IPO Law Journal |
|
Firsthand Experiences in UPC Revocation Proceedings
|
August 21, 2025 |
IPO Law Journal |
|
DISTRICT COURT IMPROPERLY TURNED OVER QUESTION OF CLAIM CONSTRUCTION TO JURY *
Lab. Corp. of Am. Holdings v. Qiagen Scis., LLC, 23-2350
|
August 13, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
|
MECHANICAL IMPROVEMENT TO SELECTORIZED DUMBBELLS WAS NOT AN ABSTRACT IDEA * *
PowerBlock Holdings, Inc. v. iFit, Inc., 24-1177
|
August 11, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
|
AMENDED CLAIM INVALID FOR LACK OF WRITTEN DESCRIPTION* *
Mondis Tech. Ltd. v. LG Elecs. Inc., 23-2117, 23-2116
|
August 08, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
|
FEDERAL CIRCUIT DENIES REHEARING EN BANC ON COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OF IPRS * *
Kroy IP Holdings, LLC v. Groupon, Inc., 23-1359
|
August 01, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
|
DISTRICT COURT’S CLAIM CONSTRUCTION WAS NOT SUPPORTED BY COMMON SPECIFICATION *
FMC Corp. v. Sharda USA, LLC, 24-2335
|
August 01, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
|
DISTRICT COURT ABUSED DISCRETION IN EXCLUDING AUTHENTICATING TESTIMONY*
Jiaxing Super Lighting Elec. Appliance, Co., Ltd. v. CH Lighting Tech. Co., Ltd., 23-1715
|
July 28, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
|
APPEAL OF LICENSING ROYALTY AWARD DID NOT NECESSARILY RAISE ISSUE OF PATENT LAW * *
Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. v. Alkermes PLC, 23-23-74
|
July 25, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
![]() |
IPOwners Quarterly™ 7/23/2025
|
July 23, 2025 |
IPOwners Quarterly |
|
USPTO INCORRECTLY DETERMINED COMMERCIAL IMPRESSIONS OF MARKS *
Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Intrastate Dists., Inc., 24-1212
|
July 23, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
|
USPTO CORRECTLY DECLINED TO APPLY INTERFERENCE ESTOPPEL TO INTER PARTES REVIEW * *
IGT v. Zynga Inc., 23-2262
|
July 22, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
|
PROSECUTION HISTORY ESTOPPEL PRECLUDES APPLICATION OF DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS * *
Colibri Heart Valve LLC v. Medtronic Corevalve, LLC, 23-2153
|
July 18, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
|
DOCTRINE OF PROSECUTION DISCLAIMER APPLIES TO DESIGN PATENTS* *
Top Brand LLC v. Cozy Comfort Co. LLC, 24-2191
|
July 17, 2025 |
IPO Federal Circuit Summaries |
