IPO REPORT ON ATTORNEY FEE SHIFTING IN PATENT INFRINGEMENT SUITS: SEPTEMBER

//IPO REPORT ON ATTORNEY FEE SHIFTING IN PATENT INFRINGEMENT SUITS: SEPTEMBER

IPO REPORT ON ATTORNEY FEE SHIFTING IN PATENT INFRINGEMENT SUITS: SEPTEMBER

IPO REPORT ON ATTORNEY FEE SHIFTING IN PATENT INFRINGEMENT SUITS: SEPTEMBER

On August 28, Judge CHHABRIA in the Northern District of California denied the accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees. Unwired Planet, LLC v. Apple Inc.

On August 28, Judge MCMAHON in the Southern District of New York granted the accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees. Advanced Video Technologies LLC v. HTC Corporation et al

On August 28, Judge SPARKS in the Western District of Texas granted over $1 million in attorney fees to the accused infringer. National Oilwell Varco, L.P. v. Omron Oilfield & Marine, Inc.

On September 1, Judge MONTGOMERY in the District of Minnesota granted $1.6 million in attorney fees to the accused infringer. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Octane Fitness, LLC

On September 2, Judge GREWAL in the Northern District of California denied the accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees. Adaptix, Inc. v. Apple Inc.

On September 3, Magistrate Judge MCALILEY in the Southern District of Florida recommended denying the accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees. Kaspersky Lab, Inc. v. Device Security LLC

On September 3, Magistrate Judge RAU in the District of Minnesota recommended denying the accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees. Clim-A-Tech Industries, Inc. v. William A. Ebert

On September 3, Judge COSTA in the Southern District of Texas denied the accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees. RLIS, Inc. v. Cerner Corporation

On September 3, Judge JACKSON in the Eastern District of Virginia denied the accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees. Stretchline Intellectual Properties Ltd. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP

On September 4, Judge GUILFORD in the Central District of California granted more than $4.1 million in attorney fees to the accused infringer. Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Universal Remote Control, Inc.

On September 4, Judge ANDREWS in the District of Delaware denied the accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees. Walker Digital, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation

On September 10, Judge CHHABRIA in the Northern District of California granted nearly $1.2 million in attorney fees to the accused infringer, with the patent owner’s attorneys jointly and severally liable for $100,000. Segan LLC v. Zynga Inc.

On September 10, Judge FRANK in the District of Minnesota denied the accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees. Larry Holmberg v. Stealth Cam, LLC

On September 14, Judge FRIOT in the Western District of Oklahoma denied the accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees. DietGoal Innovations LLC v. Taco Mayo Franchise Systems, Inc.

On September 14, Judge ROBINSON in the District of Delaware denied the accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees.Cot’N Wash, Inc. v. Sun Products Corp.

On September 17, Judge SIMON in the Northern District of Indiana denied the accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees. Stopinc Aktiengesellschaft v. J.W. Hicks, Inc.

On September 18, Judge ROGERS in the Northern District of California denied the accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees. Blue Spike, LLC v. Adobe Systems, Inc.

On September 22, Judge WHITE in the Northern District of California denied the accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees. Tainoapp, Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc.

On September 30, Judge STARK in the District of Delaware denied the accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees. Clouding IP, LLC v. EMC Corp.