{"id":14348,"date":"2015-08-27T17:21:43","date_gmt":"2015-08-27T17:21:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/?p=14348"},"modified":"2015-08-31T14:16:00","modified_gmt":"2015-08-31T14:16:00","slug":"attorney-fee-shifting-in-patent-suits-in-u-s-district-courts-august-report","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/index.php\/attorney-fee-shifting-in-patent-suits-in-u-s-district-courts-august-report\/","title":{"rendered":"ATTORNEY FEE SHIFTING IN PATENT SUITS IN U.S. DISTRICT COURTS: AUGUST REPORT"},"content":{"rendered":"

On July 30, Judge MCCAFFERTY in the District of New Hampshire denied the accused infringer\u2019s motion for attorney fees. East Coast Sheet Metal Fabricating Corp. v. Autodesk, Inc.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

On July 30, Judge YEAKEL in the Western District of Texas denied the accused infringer\u2019s motion for attorney fees. Ushijima v. Samsung Electronics Co.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

On August 3, Judge BROWNING in the District of New Mexico denied the accused infringer\u2019s motion for attorney fees. General Protecht Group, Inc. v. Leviton Manufacturing Co.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

On August 4, Magistrate Judge SPAULDING in the Middle District of Florida denied the accused infringer\u2019s motion for attorney fees.\u00a0Sweepstakes Patent Company, LLC v. Burns<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

On August 10, Judge BENITEZ in the Southern District of California denied the accused infringer\u2019s motion for attorney fees.\u00a0Pacing Technologies, LLC v. Garmin International, Inc.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

On August 11, Judge GILSTRAP in the Eastern District of Texas denied the accused infringer\u2019s motion for attorney fees. Core Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L. v. Apple Inc.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

On August 12, Judge OLGUIN in the Central District of California granted $37,000 in attorney fees to the accused infringer. Yufa v. TSI Inc.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

On August 17, Federal Circuit Judge BRYSON sitting in the Eastern District of Texas denied the accused infringer\u2019s motion for attorney fees.\u00a0Trover Group, Inc. v. Dedicated Micros USA<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

On August 18, Judge REAL in the Central District of California granted $733,414.34 in attorney fees to the accused infringer.\u00a0Large Audience Display Systems, LLC v. Tennman Productions, LLC<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

On August 18, Judge TUCKER in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granted $6.5 million in attorney fees to the accused infringers. Checkpoint Systems, Inc. v. All-Tag Security S.A.<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

On August 19, Judge SEEBORG of the Northern District of California denied accused infringer\u2019s motion for attorney fees.\u00a0Vasudevan Software, Inc. v. Microstrategy, Inc<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

On August 19, Judge BENCIVENGO of the Southern District of California granted $359,733.17 in attorney fees to the accused infringer.\u00a0Deep Sky Software, Inc. v. Southwest Airlines Co.<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

On August 20, Judge SLEET in the District of Delaware granted the accused infringer\u2019s motion for attorney fees. In re: Rembrandt Technologies<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

On August 21, Judge STEARNS in the District of Massachusetts denied the accused infringer\u2019s motion for attorney fees.Cephalon, Inc. v. Celgene Corp.<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

On August 21, Magistrate Judge NOEL in the District of Minnesota recommended denying the patent owner\u2019s motion for attorney fees. Rudolph Technologies, Inc. v. Camtek Ltd.<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

On August 24, Judge JACKSON in the Eastern District of Virginia denied the accused infringer\u2019s motion for attorney fees.Dietgoal Innovations, LLC v. Wegmans Food Markets, Inc.<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On July 30, Judge MCCAFFERTY in the District of New […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14348","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nATTORNEY FEE SHIFTING IN PATENT SUITS IN U.S. DISTRICT COURTS: AUGUST REPORT - Intellectual Property Owners Association<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ipo.org\/index.php\/attorney-fee-shifting-in-patent-suits-in-u-s-district-courts-august-report\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ATTORNEY FEE SHIFTING IN PATENT SUITS IN U.S. DISTRICT COURTS: AUGUST REPORT - Intellectual Property Owners Association\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"On July 30, Judge MCCAFFERTY in the District of New [...]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ipo.org\/index.php\/attorney-fee-shifting-in-patent-suits-in-u-s-district-courts-august-report\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Intellectual Property Owners Association\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/IPOAssociation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-08-27T17:21:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-08-31T14:16:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"ipoadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ipo\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ipo\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"ipoadmin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ipo.org\\\/index.php\\\/attorney-fee-shifting-in-patent-suits-in-u-s-district-courts-august-report\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ipo.org\\\/index.php\\\/attorney-fee-shifting-in-patent-suits-in-u-s-district-courts-august-report\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"ipoadmin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ipo.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8226b50acbf234bbf0f5d70f4a84ba47\"},\"headline\":\"ATTORNEY FEE SHIFTING IN PATENT SUITS IN U.S. DISTRICT COURTS: AUGUST REPORT\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-08-27T17:21:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-31T14:16:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ipo.org\\\/index.php\\\/attorney-fee-shifting-in-patent-suits-in-u-s-district-courts-august-report\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":426,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ipo.org\\\/#organization\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ipo.org\\\/index.php\\\/attorney-fee-shifting-in-patent-suits-in-u-s-district-courts-august-report\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ipo.org\\\/index.php\\\/attorney-fee-shifting-in-patent-suits-in-u-s-district-courts-august-report\\\/\",\"name\":\"ATTORNEY FEE SHIFTING IN PATENT SUITS IN U.S. DISTRICT COURTS: AUGUST REPORT - Intellectual Property Owners Association\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ipo.org\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-08-27T17:21:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-31T14:16:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ipo.org\\\/index.php\\\/attorney-fee-shifting-in-patent-suits-in-u-s-district-courts-august-report\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/ipo.org\\\/index.php\\\/attorney-fee-shifting-in-patent-suits-in-u-s-district-courts-august-report\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ipo.org\\\/index.php\\\/attorney-fee-shifting-in-patent-suits-in-u-s-district-courts-august-report\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ipo.org\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"ATTORNEY FEE SHIFTING IN PATENT SUITS IN U.S. DISTRICT COURTS: AUGUST REPORT\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ipo.org\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ipo.org\\\/\",\"name\":\"Intellectual Property Owners Association\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ipo.org\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ipo.org\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ipo.org\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Intellectual Property Owners Association\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ipo.org\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ipo.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ipo.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/06\\\/ipo_logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ipo.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/06\\\/ipo_logo.png\",\"width\":570,\"height\":226,\"caption\":\"Intellectual Property Owners Association\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ipo.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/IPOAssociation\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/ipo\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/ipoassociation\\\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ipo.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8226b50acbf234bbf0f5d70f4a84ba47\",\"name\":\"ipoadmin\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ipo.org\\\/index.php\\\/author\\\/ipoadmin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ATTORNEY FEE SHIFTING IN PATENT SUITS IN U.S. DISTRICT COURTS: AUGUST REPORT - Intellectual Property Owners Association","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/index.php\/attorney-fee-shifting-in-patent-suits-in-u-s-district-courts-august-report\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ATTORNEY FEE SHIFTING IN PATENT SUITS IN U.S. DISTRICT COURTS: AUGUST REPORT - Intellectual Property Owners Association","og_description":"On July 30, Judge MCCAFFERTY in the District of New [...]","og_url":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/index.php\/attorney-fee-shifting-in-patent-suits-in-u-s-district-courts-august-report\/","og_site_name":"Intellectual Property Owners Association","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/IPOAssociation\/","article_published_time":"2015-08-27T17:21:43+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-08-31T14:16:00+00:00","author":"ipoadmin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ipo","twitter_site":"@ipo","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"ipoadmin","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/index.php\/attorney-fee-shifting-in-patent-suits-in-u-s-district-courts-august-report\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/index.php\/attorney-fee-shifting-in-patent-suits-in-u-s-district-courts-august-report\/"},"author":{"name":"ipoadmin","@id":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8226b50acbf234bbf0f5d70f4a84ba47"},"headline":"ATTORNEY FEE SHIFTING IN PATENT SUITS IN U.S. DISTRICT COURTS: AUGUST REPORT","datePublished":"2015-08-27T17:21:43+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-31T14:16:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/index.php\/attorney-fee-shifting-in-patent-suits-in-u-s-district-courts-august-report\/"},"wordCount":426,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/#organization"},"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/index.php\/attorney-fee-shifting-in-patent-suits-in-u-s-district-courts-august-report\/","url":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/index.php\/attorney-fee-shifting-in-patent-suits-in-u-s-district-courts-august-report\/","name":"ATTORNEY FEE SHIFTING IN PATENT SUITS IN U.S. DISTRICT COURTS: AUGUST REPORT - Intellectual Property Owners Association","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2015-08-27T17:21:43+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-31T14:16:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/index.php\/attorney-fee-shifting-in-patent-suits-in-u-s-district-courts-august-report\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ipo.org\/index.php\/attorney-fee-shifting-in-patent-suits-in-u-s-district-courts-august-report\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/index.php\/attorney-fee-shifting-in-patent-suits-in-u-s-district-courts-august-report\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"ATTORNEY FEE SHIFTING IN PATENT SUITS IN U.S. DISTRICT COURTS: AUGUST REPORT"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/","name":"Intellectual Property Owners Association","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/#organization","name":"Intellectual Property Owners Association","url":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/ipo_logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/ipo_logo.png","width":570,"height":226,"caption":"Intellectual Property Owners Association"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/IPOAssociation\/","https:\/\/x.com\/ipo","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/ipoassociation\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8226b50acbf234bbf0f5d70f4a84ba47","name":"ipoadmin","url":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/index.php\/author\/ipoadmin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14348","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14348"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14348\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14389,"href":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14348\/revisions\/14389"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14348"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14348"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ipo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14348"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}